From a7cb62bfec02bbcd5d200eeb1ce1f8a4fde631b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karl Berry Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 07:57:16 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] autoupdate --- doc/maintain.texi | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/maintain.texi b/doc/maintain.texi index 5ec711e75..348506268 100644 --- a/doc/maintain.texi +++ b/doc/maintain.texi @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ @c For double-sided printing, uncomment: @c @setchapternewpage odd @c This date is automagically updated when you save this file: -@set lastupdate May 14, 2012 +@set lastupdate May 17, 2012 @c %**end of header @dircategory GNU organization @@ -985,12 +985,12 @@ want to use a general-purpose free software module which offers a useful functionality, as a ``library'' facility (though the module is not always packaged technically as a library). -Make sure the license of the module is compatible with current and -future GPL versions. ``GNU GPL version 3 or later'' is good, and +Make sure the license of the module is compatible with current @emph{and +future} GPL versions. ``GNU GPL version 3 or later'' is good, and so is anything which includes permission for use under those GPL versions (including ``GNU GPL version 2 or later'', ``LGPL version -n or later'', ``LGPL version 2.1'', ``GNU Affero GPL version -3 or later''). Lax permissive licenses are ok too, since they are +@var{n} or later'', ``LGPL version 2.1'', ``GNU Affero GPL version 3 +or later''). Lax permissive licenses are ok too, since they are compatible with all GPL versions. ``GPL version 2 only'' is obviously unacceptable because it is -- 2.11.0