Update the meaning of the license abbreviations.

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index d1afe9e..7401df0 100644 (file)
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 2007-10-07  Bruno Haible  <bruno@clisp.org>
 
+       * doc/gnulib-intro.texi (Copyright): Update the meaning of the license
+       abbreviations in the modules files.
+
        Change copyright notice from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+.
        * README: Change copyright notice.
        * MODULES.html.sh: Likewise.

diff --git a/doc/gnulib-intro.texi b/doc/gnulib-intro.texi
index 304edd2..63137fe 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/gnulib-intro.texi
+++ b/doc/gnulib-intro.texi
@@ -212,9 +212,9 @@ proofreading the patch.
 Most modules are under the GPL.  Some, mostly modules which can
 reasonably be used in libraries, are under LGPL.  The source files
 always say "GPL", but the real license specification is in the module
-description file.  If the module description file says "GPL", it currently
-means "GPLv2+" (GPLv2 or newer, at the licensee's choice); if it says "LGPL",
-it currently means "LGPLv2+" (LGPLv2 or newer, at the licensee's choice).
+description file.  If the module description file says "GPL", it means
+"GPLv3+" (GPLv3 or newer, at the licensee's choice); if it says "LGPL",
+it means "LGPLv3+" (LGPLv3 or newer, at the licensee's choice).
 
 More precisely, the license specification in the module description
 file applies to the files in @file{lib/} and @file{build-aux/}.  Different